Neil Gorsuch’s Contempt for Women
Putting Trump’s nominee on the Supreme Court would be devastating to women’s rights and access to reproductive care.
Putting Trump’s nominee on the Supreme Court would be devastating to women’s rights and access to reproductive care.
It was supposed to be the first transgender-rights case to make it to the nation’s highest court – so what happens now?
The Supreme Court’s announcement that it will not rule on Zubik v. Burwell, the challenge to women’s access to birth control under the Affordable Care Act, is meant to avoid a 4-to-4 deadlock by sending the issue back to lower courts. It would have been far better if the Court had simply recognized fundamental constitutional principles and human rights.
By Brittany Romagnoli, President’s Office Intern On March 2, the Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt case. This case acknowledges how targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP) laws in Texas are designed to shut down more than 75% of all women’s health clinics that provide abortion services in the state. While Read more …
It’s unfortunate that President Obama felt it was necessary to appoint a nominee to the Supreme Court whose record on issues pertaining to women’s rights is more or less a blank slate