National Organization for Women

Search:


Sign up:

to choose from our lists


Bookmark and Share Share/Save    email thisSend   printable versionPrint      Shop Amazon
National NOW Times >> Fall 2006 >> Article

South Dakota Ban: Taking the Long View

By Kim Gandy
President

Before being put on the ballot, South Dakota Governor 
        Round had the opportunity to veto the bill banning abortions; when Round 
        visited D.C., protesters gathered to proclaim the unconstitutionality 
        of the ban.

Photo by Campbell Roth

Before being put on the ballot, South Dakota Governor Round had the opportunity to veto the bill banning abortions; when Round visited D.C., protesters gathered to proclaim the unconstitutionality of the ban.

On March 6, South Dakota Gov. Mike Rounds signed a law banning nearly all abortions in the state—the most restrictive state measure enacted since Roe v. Wade legalized abortion nationwide. The ban, which was scheduled to go into effect on July 1, included no provision for rape or incest, or to protect the health of the pregnant woman, and only an unusually narrow exception to "prevent the death" of the woman.

Women's rights supporters throughout South Dakota banded together and collected tens of thousands of signatures, enough to temporarily halt implementation of the legislation, and to refer the law to the voters on November 7th.

Now we're organizing to reverse the law at the ballot box, and polling shows that we're in a position to win the vote. But here's the catch: voters believe the ban "goes too far" because there is no rape or incest exception. The same polls show that the ban would be approved if it had those exceptions, even without a health exception and without regard for other circumstances of women's lives.

But this campaign can't be about rape and incest, even though those are winning arguments in the short term. Granted, if your message-crafting is based primarily on focus groups and polling, that is no doubt the strongest argument. But it is a shortsighted (and expensive) one because even if the ban is defeated on those narrow grounds, the legislature will simply pass another ban next year which has ONLY those two exceptions. And we would have the expense (both financial and human capital) of fighting another referendum next year without the benefit of those arguments.

In our South Dakota organizing, we are making a strong argument for protecting our health and respecting women's need to plan their families, while also appealing to those voters for whom the idea of "government intrusion" into personal decisions is anathema. It's not too late for you to help.

If you are able to travel to South Dakota or another key state for the final week of the campaign, or support our reproductive justice work financially, go to
http://www.now.org/helpwanted.

Bookmark and Share Share/Save    email thisSend   printable versionPrint


give to NOW


NOW websites

Say It, Sister! Blog

NOW Foundation

NOW PACs

NOW on Campus

stay informed

Like us on Facebook Follow us on Google+ NOW's Flickr Photostream NOW's YouTube Channel
Support NOW with your purchase of print-to-order NOW products! Visit our store
shop amazon
amazon.com Support NOW by shopping at Amazon.com!
 
 
 

Actions | Join - Donate | Chapters | Members | Issues | Privacy | RSSRSS | Links | Home

© 1995-2012 National Organization for Women, All Rights Reserved. Permission granted for non-commercial use.